• NeoDB
  • Explore
  • Feed
  • Home
    • Scan barcode
    • Sign up or login
    • Preferences
5yr 容刀
cover
Mimesis [Book] Douban Goodreads
9.4 (7 ratings) author: Erich Auerbach translator: Willard R. Trask publishing house: Princeton University Press 2003 - 4
A half-century after its translation into English, Erich Auerbach's "Mimesis" still stands as a monumental achievement in literary criticism. A brilliant display of erudition, wit, and wisdom, his exploration of how great European writers from Homer to Virginia Woolf depicted reality has taught generations how to read Western literature. This new expanded edition includes a substantial essay in introduction by Edward Said as well as an essay, never before translated into English, in which Auerbach responds to his critics. A German Jew, Auerbach was forced out of his professorship at the University of Marburg in 1935. He left for Turkey, where he taught at the state university in Istanbul. There, he wrote "Mimesis", publishing it in German after the end of the war. Displaced as he was, Auerbach produced a work of great erudition that contains no footnotes, basing his arguments instead on searching, illuminating readings of key passages from his primary texts. His aim was to show how, from antiquity to the twentieth century, literature progressed toward ever more naturalistic and democratic forms of representation. This essentially optimistic view of European history now appears as a defensive - and impassioned - response to the inhumanity he saw in the Third Reich. Ranging over works in Greek, Latin, Spanish, French, Italian, German, and English, Auerbach used his remarkable skills in philology and comparative literature to refute any narrow form of nationalism or chauvinism, in his own day and ours. For many readers, both inside and outside the academy, "Mimesis" is among the finest works of literary criticism ever written.

读过《Mimesis》2009-04-06标记。当初因为对历史主义相关的思想史的兴趣而想读,如今因为对文学理论的兴趣而读完。按后记中作者自己总结的脉络,重点章节大概是1-2,8,18-20章,后记、附录和萨义德的前言也很重要。作者自承,此书不仅是一家之言(personal),而且是一偏之得(one-sided),他对所谓通过日常生活场景,描绘社会政治发展的现实主义的推崇,的确令人想到“革命的现实主义文学”,二十世纪的elevated style。他对歌德的严厉批评,也几乎与马克思的“伟大天才和庸俗小市民”断语同调。这与其说是因为奥氏有左派倾向,不如说历史主义思潮和马克思的理论,确有德国(黑格尔)亲缘性。附录中奥氏承认,论阅读的愉悦,他喜欢歌德远超法国现实主义。整本书是批评家的严肃,这一句,是读者的诚实。

容刀
@inderweltsein@neodb.social
7 following  ·  75 followers

在豆瓣上叫“独孤力命”。 名字太中二,一直想改,没有合适机会。现在敢情有了。



关注我们建议反馈站点公约 About API Apps
You are visiting an alternative domain for NeoDB, please always use original version if possible.