读过《Tacit and Explicit Knowledge》 🌕🌕🌕🌑🌑
想要创造出一个关于默会知识的图谱,于是发明了一个本体论:「弦」,这玩意基本上跟「以太」的作用差不多,就是作者脑子里面进行推理的一个工具。Collins根据:人与人的关系、身体和头脑的关系、以及社会的「本质」把默会知识分类撑RTK, STK, CTK。再结合一些例子和经典文献。怎么获得这些知识呢——by just living in society (p.195)这也太不社会学了吧?对话的主要是关于智能机的文献。从很实证的角度做延伸的常规科学写作。
Book
Tacit and Explicit Knowledge
Douban
Harry Collins
publishing house:
University of Chicago Press
2010
- 5
Much of what humans know we cannot say. And much of what we do we cannot describe. For example, how do we know how to ride a bike when we can't explain how we do it? Abilities like this were called 'tacit knowledge' by physical chemist and philosopher Michael Polanyi, but here Harry Collins analyzes the term, and the behavior, in much greater detail, often departing from Polanyi's treatment. In "Tacit and Explicit Knowledge", Collins develops a common conceptual language to bridge the concept's disparate domains by explaining explicit knowledge and classifying tacit knowledge. Collins then teases apart the three very different meanings, which, until now, all fell under the umbrella of Polanyi's term: relational tacit knowledge (things we could describe in principle if someone put effort into describing them), somatic tacit knowledge (things our bodies can do but we cannot describe how, like balancing on a bike), and collective tacit knowledge (knowledge we draw that is the property of society, such as the rules for language). Thus, bicycle riding consists of some somatic tacit knowledge and some collective tacit knowledge, such as the knowledge that allows us to navigate in traffic. The intermixing of the three kinds of tacit knowledge has led to confusion in the past; Collins's book will at last unravel the complexities of the idea. Tacit knowledge drives everything from language, science, education, and management to sports, art, and our interaction with technology. In Collins' able hands, it also functions at last as a framework for understanding human behavior in a range of disciplines.