读过《Seeing the World》 🌕🌕🌕🌑🌑
一般般,数据很水。有意思的地方可能是1)描述Chaos of Discipline之外的non-departmental structure在大学内的发展(但其实这样也不需要数据,理论就行了);以及2)区域研究的特殊地位──后者可以算是这批数据的核心吧。这个历史研究还算可以,但也不够批判(作者没怎么分析区域研究和美国霸权之间的直接联系)。
Book
Seeing the World
Douban
Mitchell L. Stevens
/
Cynthia Miller-Idriss
…
publishing house:
Princeton University Press
2018
- 2
An in-depth look at why American universities continue to favor U.S.-focused social science research despite efforts to make scholarship more cosmopolitan
U.S. research universities have long endeavored to be cosmopolitan places, yet the disciplines of economics, political science, and sociology have remained stubbornly parochial. Despite decades of government and philanthropic investment in international scholarship, the most prestigious academic departments still favor research and expertise on the United States. Why? Seeing the World answers this question by examining university research centers that focus on the Middle East and related regional area studies.
Drawing on candid interviews with scores of top scholars and university leaders to understand how international inquiry is perceived and valued inside the academy, Seeing the World explains how intense competition for tenure-line appointments encourages faculty to pursue “American” projects that are most likely to garner professional advancement. At the same time, constrained by tight budgets at home, university leaders eagerly court patrons and clients worldwide but have a hard time getting departmental faculty to join the program. Together these dynamics shape how scholarship about the rest of the world evolves.
At once a work-and-occupations study of scholarly disciplines, an essay on the formal organization of knowledge, and an inquiry into the fate of area studies, Seeing the World is a must-read for anyone who cares about the future of knowledge in a global era.