读过《Nation, Governance, and Modernity in China》 🌕🌕🌕🌕🌑
重点看了工人的部分。国家在民国初期试图发展一个有利于建构国家合法性的公民社会，然而“社会“逐渐超出了国家控制，并且显现出内斗的特征。对于国家-“社会“关系提供了很好的反思。但是也留下了很多问题没有解决。
Nation, Governance, and Modernity in China [Book] Douban
author:
Michael Tsin
publishing house:
Stanford University Press
2000
- 1
Review
"Tsin's book is well organized, refreshingly concise, and... highly readable " - Journal of Asian Studies "In this elegantly written and meticulously researched study, Tsin uses a social history of early twentieth-century Canton to explore the meaning and mechanisms of the political culture of modernity. One of the book's great strengths is Tsin's success in bringing social-historical and theoretical analyses together, using one to illuminate the other." - Journal of Interdisciplinary History --This text refers to the Paperback edition.
Review
“For researchers carrying up-to-date toolkits into the Chinese past, Tsin’s judicious analysis will be a model of clarity in exposition as well as a guide to the formation of China modernist discourses on national and social revolution.”—Canadian Journal of History
“Tsin’s book is well organized, refreshingly concise, and . . . highly readable.”—Journal of Asian Studies
“In this elegantly written and meticulously researched study, Tsin uses a social history of early 20th-century Canton to explore the meaning and mechanisms of the political culture of modernity. One of the book’s great strengths is Tsin’s success in bringing social-historical and theoretical analyses together, using one to illuminate the other.” —Journal of Interdisciplinary History
"Tsin's book is well organized, refreshingly concise, and... highly readable " - Journal of Asian Studies "In this elegantly written and meticulously researched study, Tsin uses a social history of early twentieth-century Canton to explore the meaning and mechanisms of the political culture of modernity. One of the book's great strengths is Tsin's success in bringing social-historical and theoretical analyses together, using one to illuminate the other." - Journal of Interdisciplinary History --This text refers to the Paperback edition.
Review
“For researchers carrying up-to-date toolkits into the Chinese past, Tsin’s judicious analysis will be a model of clarity in exposition as well as a guide to the formation of China modernist discourses on national and social revolution.”—Canadian Journal of History
“Tsin’s book is well organized, refreshingly concise, and . . . highly readable.”—Journal of Asian Studies
“In this elegantly written and meticulously researched study, Tsin uses a social history of early 20th-century Canton to explore the meaning and mechanisms of the political culture of modernity. One of the book’s great strengths is Tsin’s success in bringing social-historical and theoretical analyses together, using one to illuminate the other.” —Journal of Interdisciplinary History