2mo Victor Villas
Playing Possum [图书] 豆瓣
作者: Susana Monsó Princeton University Press 2024 - 10
When the opossum feels threatened, she becomes paralyzed. Her body temperature plummets, her breathing and heart rates drop to a minimum, and her glands simulate the smell of a putrefying corpse. Playing Possum explores what the opossum and other creatures can teach us about how we and other species understand mortality, and demonstrates that the concept of death, far from being a uniquely human attribute, is widespread in the animal kingdom.
With humor and empathy, Susana Monsó tells the stories of ants who attend their own funerals, chimpanzees who clean the teeth of their dead, dogs who snack on their caregivers, crows who avoid the places where they saw a carcass, elephants obsessed with collecting ivory, and whales who carry their dead for weeks. Monsó, one of today’s leading experts on animal cognition and ethics, shows how there are more ways to conceive of mortality than the human way, and challenges the notion that the only emotional reactions to death worthy of our attention are ones that resemble our own.
Blending philosophical insight with new evidence from behavioral science and comparative psychology, Playing Possum dispels the anthropocentric biases that cloud our understanding of the natural world, and reveals that, when it comes to death and dying, we are just another animal.

finished reading Playing Possum 🌕🌕🌕🌕🌗
As a non biologist, this book was a super interesting listen for the compilation of studies regarding animal behavior and the respective anthropomorphism/anthropectomy we tend to color them. This is the rare non-fiction book that does NOT draw the reader towards The One Book mindset - where a concept is overstretched until it becomes a hammer capable of nailing all screws known to humankind.

I think the structural design of the book works well. As expected from a philosopher, the thesis is built from the ground up and a lot of effort is put into what these concepts are _not_ saying. I like it, but I can imagine that readers not used to the extra precision and nitpicking common to philosophy writers will find it a bit dry or dense at times.

The one small gripe I have is that after all this effort, the final chapter ends up playing like a shortcut. The case for animals having a concept of death brought by the distinction between tonic immobility and thanatosis (faking death, aka playing possum) and what this tells us about predators is mostly not dependant on the framework the book invests in building. It's such a strong case, it feels like the core issue is answered by reading the first two or three chapters plus the last one, and everything in between is superfluous - but even the filler was very interesting to me, so it was time well spent anyway.