中国历史
汉书
Douban
班固 publishing house: 中华书局 2007 - 1
《汉书》这部史学巨著,分为纪12篇,主要记载西汉帝王的事迹;表8篇,主要记载汉代的人物事迹等;志10篇,专述典章制度、天文、地理以及各种社会现象;传70篇,主要记载各类人物的生平以及少数民族的历史等。班固作《汉书》沿袭《史记》的体例,所不同的是《史记》有世家,《汉书》没有;《史记》记载典章制度的部分叫作“书”,《汉书》改称“志”。《史记》贯通古今,不以朝代为限,所以叫通史。《汉书》纪传所记的都是西汉一代的史实,所以叫断代史。断代为史始于班固,以后列朝的所谓“正史”都沿袭《汉书》的体裁,正如刘知几所说“自尔讫今,无改斯道”了。可见,其史学地位之重要。此外,《汉书》在我国文学史上的地位也很突出。它写社会各阶层人物都以“实录”精神,平实中见生动,堪称后世传记文学的典范,例如《霍光传》、《苏武传》、《外戚传》、《朱买臣传》等。
史记(全十册)
Douban
★ 9.3 68 ratings
司马迁 / 张守节 translator: (索隐)司马贞,(正义)张守节 publishing house: 中华书局 1982 - 11
史记是我国第一部通史。在史记之前,有以年代为次的“编年史”如春秋,有以地域为限的“国别史”如国语、战国策,有以文告档卷形式保存下来的“政治史”如尚书,可是没有上下几千年,包罗各方面,而又融会贯通,�络分明,像史记那样的通史。 唐刘知几的史通分叙六家,统归二体。所谓“二体”,就是“编年体”和“纪传体”,而史记是纪传体的创始。从此以后,历代的所谓“正史,从汉书到明史,尽管名目有改变(例如汉书改“书”为“志”,晋书改世家”为“载记”),门类有短缺(例如汉书无“世家”,后汉书、三国志等都无“表”、“志及世家”),但都有“纪”有“传”,绝无例外地沿袭了史记的体例。 据司马迁自序,史记全书本纪十二篇,表十篇,书八篇,世家三十篇,列传七十篇(包括太史公自序),共一百三十篇。今本史记一百三十卷,篇数跟司马迁自序所说的相符。但汉书司马迁传说其中“十篇缺,有录无书。三国魏张晏注:“迁没之后,亡景纪、武纪、礼书、乐书、兵书(按:即律书)、汉兴以来将相年表、日者传、三王世家、龟策列传、传靳列传。兀成之间,褚先生补缺,作武帝纪、三王世家、龟策、日者列传,言辞鄙陋,非迁本意也。可见司马迁编写史记,只能说是基本上完成,其中有若干篇,或者没有写定,或者已经定稿而后来散失了。
山月记
Douban
★ 8.8 116 ratings
[日]中岛敦 translator: 韩冰 / 孙志勇 publishing house: 中华书局 2013 - 5
这是日本天才作家中岛敦的第一本中文简体版精选集,收录中岛敦《山月记》《弟子》《李陵》《光•风•梦》等九篇代表作。中岛敦的小说多取材于中国古典故事,独出心裁,文字优美,探究人性的幽暗与自我的存在,充满现代特质,深获读者喜爱。 【本书特色】 1,日本天才作家中岛敦作品中文简体版首次面世,重塑中国古典,让你认识自我,读懂人性的挣扎! 2,《山月记》是日本高中语文教材常选篇目,日文版《李陵•山月记》高踞日本“五大杰出小说”榜首,排名超越芥川龙之介《罗生门》和夏目漱石《哥儿》! 【评论推荐】 中岛敦作为对人性的知性的理解者,在他的身上有一种穿越性,这种穿越性可以和夏目漱石以及晚年的幸田露伴媲美。 ——日本作家 伊藤整 中岛敦的中国题材历史小说显示了一种成熟和练达,表现了纯文学所具有的高雅与纯正的艺术品位。 ——北京师范大学文学院教授 王向远 中岛敦学贯中西,不仅深谙中国古典,还精通西方文学和哲学。他的作品不仅有简洁、高迈的汉文格调,还充满了深刻的哲理,蕴含着他对人的存在及命运的深刻洞见。 ——宁波大学外语学院副教授 郭勇
史记(点校本二十四史修订本)
Douban
司马迁 著 / 裴骃 集解 … translator: 点校本《史记》修订组 publishing house: 中华书局 2013 - 8
《史记》是我国第一部纪传体通史,为“二十四史”之首。全书一百三十卷,其记载始于传说中的黄帝,迄于汉武帝时期,被誉为“史家之绝唱,无韵之离骚”。 1959年,在毛泽东、周恩来等国家领导的指示下,顾颉刚先生领衔整理的《史记》点校本出版,以其分段精善、校勘审慎、标点妥贴,有关技术处理得当,成为半个世纪以来最为通行的《史记》整理本,中国历史典籍整理标志性成果。 此修订本历时8年,是二十一世纪最新学术成果和学术水准的集中体现。
簪缨世家
Douban
★ 7.1 7 ratings
萧华荣 publishing house: 三联书店 2008 - 8
与谢氏相比,王氏家族更重权位功名,所获得的政治权势使其成为中国第一豪族。王氏子弟玄礼双修,善于权变,不断适应政治形势。其家族历史不仅是一部两晋南朝的权力更迭史,而且是一部思想流变史。以“书圣”王羲之为代表的王氏世代书法家则标识着这个家族的另一种更为永恒的风流。
汉书(全十二册)
Douban
★ 9.5 17 ratings
班固 translator: 颜师古 注释 publishing house: 中华书局 1962 - 6
《汉书》一百二十卷,是由十二本纪、八表、十志和七十列传组成的。所记启于汉高祖,止於王莽,都是西汉一代的史实,所以叫断代史(表、志也有不限於西汉的,如古今人表就包括很多汉以前的人物,但这是个别的)。断代为史始于班固,以后列朝的所谓“正史”都沿袭汉书的体裁。上至帝王将相,下至名士隐者,天文食货,百官群县,无所不有。
魏晋南北朝史论丛
Douban
唐长孺 publishing house: 中华书局 2011 - 4
本书共收作者20世纪50年代以前的论文13篇,文章对魏晋南北朝时期的生产关系、阶级结构、土地和赋税制度、兵制、门阀政治、民族问题、宗教及文化等问题详加论证,具有极高的学术价值。1955年由三联书店出版, 1978年重印时曾做了一些修改。此次收入《唐长孺文集》,除进行了核校外,部分内容恢复了55年版文字。
魏晋南北朝隋唐史三论
Douban
★ 9.7 6 ratings
唐长孺 publishing house: 中华书局 2011 - 4
本书除“绪论”、“综论”外,分三个篇章,分别讨论了魏晋、南北朝、唐代经济、政治、军事及思想学术等问题,提出或解决了魏晋隋唐时期许多前人鲜及的重大问题。本书是作者长期研究魏晋南北朝隋唐历史理论性概括,于作者中国古代分期魏晋封建论有详尽的论证。
说春秋之一齐楚崛起
Douban
贾志刚 publishing house: 广西师范大学出版社 2009 - 7
如果提一个问题,中国历史上哪一个时代最不可缺失?如果我们只能留下一个,应该留下哪一个? 清朝?零分;明朝?零分;宋朝?1分;唐朝?2分;汉朝?3分,接近答案了。 正确答案是:春秋战国,也就是东周。 为什么这样说?了解春秋就知道了。
绚烂的世界帝国:隋唐时代
絢爛たる世界帝国 隋唐時代 Douban
★ 7.9 25 ratings
【日】气贺泽 保规 translator: 石晓军 publishing house: 广西师范大学出版社 2014 - 2
本书为讲谈社《中国的历史》中的“隋唐”一卷。 《中国的历史》为日本讲谈社百周年献礼之作,是日本历史学家写给大众的中国通史读本。丛书自上古到近代,内容含概量大,撰述者均为日本该领域的代表性学者,作品大多构思巧妙,写法轻松,观点新颖,富于洞见,但同时又吸取了近些年来的诸多学术成果,利用了最新出土的史料,是一套可读性与严肃性兼备的重磅历史佳作。 一般教科书对隋代的历史总是匆匆带过。气贺泽先生对于隋朝的历史,则颇为重视,有些看法颇为新颖。作者特别肯定隋朝初年在制度建设上的成就,认为高熲、苏威几个人合作,短短几年时间大刀阔斧地进行了一系列制度变革,从而奠定了隋朝开皇之治的基础。作者特别强调佛教对于巩固隋朝统治的意义。就全书的侧重点而言,作者对于贞观之治评价不高,论述简略;对于武则天的掌权,则与同时期日本等东亚其他地域的女主政权做出联想。与一般中国教科书或者断代史不同,作者对于唐代花街柳巷世界、长安和洛阳的城市景观、五代山及房山云居寺等地的佛教文化都要专门的叙述。在国际中国史研究中,日本学者有独特的优势,形成了自己学术风格和学术传统。本书在一定程度上,反映了作者本人和当代日本隋唐历史研究综合性成果,体现了日本学者观察隋唐历史的独特视角。
Neither Donkey nor Horse
Douban
Sean Hsiang-lin Lei publishing house: University Of Chicago Press 2014 - 9
Neither Donkey nor Horse tells the story of how Chinese medicine was transformed from the antithesis of modernity in the early twentieth century into a potent symbol of and vehicle for China’s exploration of its own modernity half a century later. Instead of viewing this transition as derivative of the political history of modern China, Sean Hsiang-lin Lei argues that China’s medical history had a life of its own, one that at times directly influenced the ideological struggle over the meaning of China’s modernity and the Chinese state. Far from being a remnant of China’s premodern past, Chinese medicine in the twentieth century coevolved with Western medicine and the Nationalist state, undergoing a profound transformation—institutionally, epistemologically, and materially—that resulted in the creation of a modern Chinese medicine. This new medicine was derided as “neither donkey nor horse” because it necessarily betrayed both of the parental traditions and therefore was doomed to fail. Yet this hybrid medicine survived, through self-innovation and negotiation, thus challenging the conception of modernity that rejected the possibility of productive crossbreeding between the modern and the traditional. By exploring the production of modern Chinese medicine and China’s modernity in tandem, Lei offers both a political history of medicine and a medical history of the Chinese state. Review “In this insightful and provocative book, Lei shows us what it meant to practice ‘modern’ medicine in Mao Zedong’s semicolonial and semifeudal society. Drawing on rich historical sources, Neither Donkey nor Horse reveals that modern medicine will always be mongrel medicine. Importantly, Lei gives us the critical postcolonial genealogy for ‘Traditional Chinese Medicine,’ the epitome of Chinese modernity, now a global phenomenon.” (Warwick Anderson, University of Sydney) “Reaching far beyond the history of modern China, Neither Donkey nor Horse challenges conventional understanding of modernity, science, and state power through an intellectual and social history of medical debate and development in East Asia from the late nineteenth century forward. This is a thoughtful and meticulously researched investigation of transnational modernizing processes in the twentieth century as they touched down and transformed worlds in China. The book demonstrates that medical knowledge and practice, whether ‘modern’ or ‘traditional,’ historicized or fixed as policy, are nowhere innocent of politics, culture, and social hierarchy. It offers surprising historical lessons for everyone interested in science and local knowledge, socialism and capitalism, institutions and ideas about nature as they weave together in modern regimes of health and population governance.” (Judith Farquhar, University of Chicago) “Neither Donkey nor Horse is a tour de force of how both Western and Chinese medicine played central roles not only in Chinese modernity but also the formation of the state in Republican China. Lei thus adroitly relates the politics of medicine and debates over making Chinese medicine more scientific to the big themes of nationalism, the state, and modernity that dominated the political struggles of early twentieth-century China.” (Marta Hanson, Johns Hopkins University) “Neither Donkey nor Horse is a major work by the leading scholar in the field of modern Chinese medical history. Lei argues that what we now know as traditional Chinese medicine as it emerged as a discourse in the early twentieth century was fundamentally shaped by the encounter with Western medicine and the relationship with the state that this dictated. Chinese medicine was something new that was created during this period in response to themes with Western biomedicine as traditional practitioners sought social mobility through participation in the state. Lei’s argument is backed up by research of the highest standard: his knowledge of the historical sources is outstanding, and he is impressively familiar with the secondary and theoretical literature in both English and Chinese. His book will be of interest not only to historians of Republican China but also to those interested in the history of science more widely.” (Henrietta Harrison, University of Oxford) “If you are going to read just one book on the modern history of Chinese medicine, this is the work to read. Lei’s analysis of the entwinement of medicine, science, modernity, and the state is brilliantly original and persuasive, and argued with admirable clarity. Neither Donkey nor Horse is a major contribution to science studies and the history of global health, as well as to the study of twentieth-century China.” (Shigehisa Kuriyama, Harvard University)