社会学
布尔迪厄传
Pierre Bourdieu. Un structuralisme héroïque Douban
[法] 让-路易·法比尼亚(Jean-Louis,Fabian) translator: 陈秀萍 publishing house: 中国人民大学出版社 2021 - 1
作为伟大的社会学家,布尔迪厄的著作在世界各地取得了成功,但其身为社会学宗师的盛名,有时反而遮蔽了其著作思想的真正面目,对布尔迪厄著作的解读,并非总能切中理论核心,引人正确思考其许多经典概念。不同于一般学界以精英知识分子方法诠释布尔迪厄理论,作为布尔迪厄的学生,法国社会学家让-路易·法比亚尼尝试用布尔迪厄自行创造的分析工具来解释布尔迪厄思想,这本书重新发现了大师从未示人、深处暗藏的思想灵光,开启了一条思考布尔迪厄、反思社会学的新理路。本书分成三部分:首先,将分析三个基本概念(场域、关系以及文化资本),以及三者同时应用时所产生的修正与困难。第二部分,则针对布尔迪厄独到的方法论与叙事方式,这两者既激发出种种概念生机,也导致诸多诠释上的暧昧。第三部分,则是借着政治活动、痛苦与爱等议题来描绘一位社会学家的生平,以及一名开辟出新天地的知识英雄的主要轮廓。本书尝试同时顾及两个方面,一是针对布尔迪厄理论的中心概念进行精确分析,就其理论力量与气魄而言,这一分析是理所当然的。另一方面,则是将其概念形成的经过,植入一个深具角力意味的场域中,这一做法必要且符合布尔迪厄一贯的处理方式。这是将布尔迪厄重新整合到他自己创建出来的分析架构中,这不是为了营造一种套公式的做法,而是为了将之置于透视镜下,并且检验其限制。
西塞罗三论
Cato Maior de Senectute. Laelius de Amicitia. De Divinatione Douban
[古罗马] 西塞罗 translator: 徐奕春 publishing house: 商务印书馆 1998
西塞罗(公元前106-前43年)是古罗马最著名的演说家、政治家和散文家之一。在其三论——论老年、论友谊、论责任——中,他利用自己渊博的知识、雄辩的口才和华丽的笔触,对社会生活和人生中的一些重要问题,诸如人的道德责任、友谊、老年、死亡、个人与国家的关系、统治者的责任、外交事务中的道德原则等,作了透彻的分析和系统的阐述。“三论”被视为古典时代散文之杰作,至今仍为人们广为传诵。
疯癫与文明
Folie et Déraison: Histoire de la folie à l'âge classique Douban Goodreads
★ 9.1 91 ratings
[法] 米歇尔·福柯 translator: 刘北成 / 杨远婴 publishing house: 生活·读书·新知三联书店 2003 - 1 other title: 疯癫与文明
Madness & Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason, by Michel Foucault, is an examination of the ideas, practices, institutions, art & literature relating to madness in Western history. It's an abridged English edition of Histoire de la folie à l'âge classique, originally published in 1961 as Folie et déraison. Histoire de la folie à l'âge classique. A full translation, The History of Madness, was published by Routledge in 6/2006. This was his 1st major book, written while Director of the Maison de France in Sweden. This history begins in the Middle Ages, noting the social & physical exclusion of lepers. It argues that with the gradual disappearance of leprosy, madness came to occupy this excluded position. The ship of fools in the 15th century is a literary version of one such exclusionary practice, the practice of sending mad people away in boats. However, during the Renaissance, madness was regarded as a common phenomenon because humans couldn't attain Divine Reason. As Cervantes' Don Quixote, all humans are weak to desires & dissimulation. Therefore, the insane, understood as those who had come too close to God's Reason, were accepted in the middle of society. It isn't before the 17th century, in a movement famously called the Great Confinement, that unreasonable people systematically were institutionalized. In the 18th century, the mad came to be seen as having lost what made them human & become animalistic & treated as such. It isn't before 19th century that madness was regarded as an illness to be cured. Foucault wasn't talking about medical institutions designed specifically for the insane but about the creation of houses of confinement for social outsiders, including not only the insane but also vagrants, the poor & orphans, & what effect those houses of confinement had on the insane & perceptions of madness in the West. He demonstrates that while confinement of social outcastes was a generally European phenomenon, it had a unique development in France & distinct developments in other countries such as Germany & England. Foucault also argues that madness during the Renaissance had the power to signify the limits of social order & to point to a deeper truth. This was silenced by Enlightened Reason. He also examines the rise of modern scientific & humanitarian treatment of the insane, notably at the hands of Philippe Pinel & Samuel Tuke. He claims these modern treatments were no less controlling than previous methods. Tuke's country retreat for the mad consisted of punishing them until they gave up their commitment to madness. Similarly, Pinel's treatment of the mad amounted to an extended aversion therapy, including such treatments as cold showers & straitjackets. This treatment amounted to repeated brutality until the pattern of judgment & punishment was internalized by the patient.
潜规则(修订版)
Google Books Douban
★ 8.3 60 ratings
吴思 publishing house: 复旦大学出版社 2009 - 2 other title: 潜规则
这部以历史为解读对象的著作中,作者以亦雅亦俗、亦庄亦谐的写作方式,叙述了历史上值得人们思考的大大小小的无数案例,在生动、有趣地讲述官场故事的同时,作者透过历史表象,揭示出隐藏在正式规则之下、实际上支配着社会运行的不成文的规矩,并将其名之日“潜规则”,进而指出潜规则的产生在于现实的利害计算与趋利避害。书中对于潜规则的定义、特征,潜规则阴影下皇帝、官员、百姓的不同处境与抉择,潜规则盛行的社会土壤,以及潜规则何时会萎缩,均有论述。潜规则现象产生、盛行于我国的封建社会,但它一时还难以消失,只有加强社会主义民主,健全社会主义法制,才能最后根除潜规则。
中国文化的深层结构
Douban
★ 7.8 12 ratings
孙隆基 publishing house: 中信出版社 2015 - 11
【内容简介】 ◎孙隆基先生最负盛名之作,全新修订版问世 ◎入木三分的文化批判,80年代知识界的著名战斗檄文 ◎重新理解中国文化语境下的“国家与社会”“个人与世界” ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 良心、人心、关心、攻心、掏心、交心、以心换心——“心”在中国文化中起着怎样的组织和主导作用? 终身、人身、翻身、出身、修身、舍身、身不由己——中国人为什么喜欢用没有精神性的“身”来称呼自己? 几千年来,“安心”与“安身”的愿望如何构建起了中国文化的深层结构?个体的习惯又将如何反映出民族的劣根性和国家的政治格局? 孙隆基先生把中国上下三千年当做一个“长时段”,用结构观念——针对特定范围的一种共时性设定——来研究中国历史和这种历史延续所生成的文化特征。其匠心独运之处在于,不是泛泛地罗列出这个民族的国民的劣根性,然后提出老生常谈的补救之道,而是用近乎千刀万剐的切割,给人以深处其间而欲全力挣脱的浓烈感觉,从而达到文化批判的深远诉求。 【编辑推荐】 1、本书探讨了“个人”与“社会”在20世纪的中国受到哪些因素的左右。“仁者,人也。”中国传统思想影响了多少人的心理结构?中国人缘何缺乏自我自主意识?这些问题都可在本书中窥见一斑。 2、本书中谈到的“深层结构”并非历史时序,也不属于逻辑意义上的因果关系范围,而是讨论了中国的共时性设定。书中的许多历史例证并非一一列举所谓国民“劣根性”,而是从中国历经变化后仍保持自我认同的这个角度,对中国文化做出全面深刻的批判。
论人类不平等的起源和基础
Discours sur l'origine et les fondements de l'inégalité parmi les hommes Douban
★ 8.3 41 ratings
[法]卢梭 translator: 李常山 publishing house: 商务印书馆 1997 - 2
本书是“汉译世界学术名著丛书”之一,是1755年卢梭应法国第戎科学院的征文而写的论文。在性质上,这是一部阐发政治思想的著作,其重要性仅次于1762年卢梭的《社会契约论》;而在思想体系上,本书可视为《社会契约论》的基础的绪论。当卢梭同时代的一些哲学家把人类的进步设想为一个不断上升的过程时,卢梭却已发现人类历史发展本身所具有的两面性(进步与落后)和所包含的内在矛盾。他认为贫困和奴役,亦即人类不平等的产
Thick
Douban Goodreads
Tressie McMillan Cottom publishing house: New Press 2019 - 1 other title: Thick: And Other Essays
In these eight piercing explorations on beauty, media, money, and more, Tressie McMillan Cottom—award-winning professor and acclaimed author of Lower Ed—embraces her venerated role as a purveyor of wit, wisdom, and Black Twitter snark about all that is right and much that is wrong with this thing we call society. Ideas and identity fuse effortlessly in this vibrant collection that on bookshelves is just as at home alongside Rebecca Solnit and bell hooks as it is beside Jeff Chang and Janet Mock. It also fills an important void on those very shelves: a modern black American feminist voice waxing poetic on self and society, serving up a healthy portion of clever prose and southern aphorisms as she covers everything from Saturday Night Live, LinkedIn, and BBQ Becky to sexual violence, infant mortality, and Trump rallies. Thick speaks fearlessly to a range of topics and is far more genre-bending than a typical compendium of personal essays. An intrepid intellectual force hailed by the likes of Trevor Noah, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, and Oprah, Tressie McMillan Cottom is “among America’s most bracing thinkers on race, gender, and capitalism of our time” (Rebecca Traister). This stunning debut collection—in all its intersectional glory—mines for meaning in places many of us miss, and reveals precisely how the political, the social, and the personal are almost always one and the same.
Read
Feb. 7, 2020
两个想法,一,有色人种,女性,时常需要额外地着罗衣,以此向人们昭示,你是有资格呆在这个class的。只有衣冠能证明你不是误入其间,窃居于此。二,也是作者没有明确点出来的,女性,有色人种女性,在这个社会是作为客体存在的。男性的优秀被视为是整个群体的优秀,而女性的优秀,被视为突出的个人。“你跟那些人(你的群体)很不一样”。而作者没有提到、但却显而易见的一个事实是,当涉及负面事件的时候,这个观念会反过来。男性的败类是个人的堕落,而某个女性的负面行为则被归咎于群体,“女人总爱这样”。这是主体客体意识造成的差异。
文化 美国 女权 others 黑人女权
政治秩序的起源
The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution Douban BooksTW
★ 9.0 72 ratings
[美] 弗朗西斯·福山 translator: 毛俊杰 publishing house: 广西师范大学出版社 2014 - 9
梁文道、刘瑜、熊培云、许知远联袂主编——“理想国译丛”(MIRROR)系列之一(005)——保持开放性的思想和非功利的眼睛,看看世界的丰富性与复杂性。本书有刘瑜专文导读“重读福山之二:重新带回国家”。 成功的现代自由民主制,将强大的国家、法治和负责制政府三种机制结合在稳定的平衡中。那么,这三种机构最初来自何方?是什么力量驱使它们诞生?又在何等条件下得到发展?建立的顺序如何?彼此间有何关系? 当代最重要的政治思想家之一弗朗西斯•福山,为我们提供了一幅今日政治机构是如何从历史中发展出来的全面画卷。《政治秩序的起源》(第一卷),把对政治秩序的探讨向前延伸到人类的灵长目祖先,然后依次讲述人类部落社会的出现,第一个现代国家在中国的生长,法治在印度和中东的开始,一直到法国大革命前夕问责制政府在欧洲的发展。《政治秩序的起源》是一次严密的尝试,力图通过多学科的综合研究,形成对人类历史的概览,建立一个理解政治制度演化的宏大框架。 本书第二卷将延伸到当代,敬请期待。