读过《On Suicide Bombing》 🌕🌕🌕🌕🌑
这本书比较不像社会学,更像是政治哲学。开篇一章的问题超越了具体经验,既现代国家以人道主义的法律为限(却常逾越)发动的战争war与极端组织的恐袭terror真的有本质区别吗?倒是挺期待下周课上穆斯林同学怎么讲,不过我稍微感觉作者在前面通过回到伊斯兰传统来驳斥其他学者也有些问题,大概像“你们都不懂伊斯兰,才单纯误以为suicide bombing是一种前现代的,牺牲的,仪式性的杀人自杀行为。”
On Suicide Bombing [Book] Douban
author:
Talal Asad
publishing house:
Seagull Books
2008
- 1
Like many people in America and around the world, Talal Asad experienced the events of September 11, 2001, largely through the media and the emotional response of others. For many non-Muslims, "the suicide bomber" quickly became the icon of "an Islamic culture of death"& mdash;a conceptual leap that struck Asad as problematic. Is there a "religiously-motivated terrorism?" If so, how does it differ from other cruelties? What makes its motivation "religious"? Where does it stand in relation to other forms of collective violence?Drawing on his extensive scholarship in the study of secular and religious traditions as well as his understanding of social, political, and anthropological theory and research, Asad questions Western assumptions regarding death and killing. He scrutinizes the idea of a "clash of civilizations," the claim that "Islamic jihadism" is the essence of modern terror, and the arguments put forward by liberals to justify war in our time. He critically engages with a range of explanations of suicide terrorism, exploring many writers' preoccupation with the motives of perpetrators. In conclusion, Asad examines our emotional response to suicide (including suicide terrorism) and the horror it invokes.On Suicide Bombingis an original and provocative analysis critiquing the work of intellectuals from both the left and the right. Though fighting evil is an old concept, it has found new and disturbing expressions in our contemporary "war on terror." For Asad, it is critical that we remain aware of the forces shaping the discourse surrounding this mode of violence, and by questioning our assumptions about morally good and morally evil ways of killing, he illuminates the fragile contradictions that are a part of our modern subjectivity.