读过《疯癫与文明》 🌕🌕🌕🌕🌑
个人认为书名用《疯癫与非理性——理性时代的疯癫史》更精准,其实我是抱着能了解疯癫与文明的辩证定义的目的去看的,结果文章重点并不在此,作者明显已经承认了疯癫,然后再去探讨。再次提醒自己“作者本人拟的副标题一般比标题更能概括文章”。如副标题所说,本书的本质是史学书,“理性时代”被截为文艺复兴、古典时代、近现代,作者每章以几个重要例子为核心按时间顺序说明了疯癫在西方理性时代中的嬗变,从文艺复兴时代在艺术中的意象,到古典时期的混乱的禁闭与奇怪医学的治疗,再到近现代出现的精神病院与道德审判。作者并没有以一种实用医学的角度看待疯癫,而是以一种掺杂了艺术、哲学、社会、古医学却不预设立场的史学角度去看待的。
#关大杂烩
Book
疯癫与文明
Folie et Déraison: Histoire de la folie à l'âge classique Douban Goodreads
[法] 米歇尔·福柯
translator:
刘北成
/
杨远婴
publishing house:
生活·读书·新知三联书店
2003
- 1
other title:
疯癫与文明
Madness & Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason, by Michel Foucault, is an examination of the ideas, practices, institutions, art & literature relating to madness in Western history. It's an abridged English edition of Histoire de la folie à l'âge classique, originally published in 1961 as Folie et déraison. Histoire de la folie à l'âge classique. A full translation, The History of Madness, was published by Routledge in 6/2006. This was his 1st major book, written while Director of the Maison de France in Sweden.
This history begins in the Middle Ages, noting the social & physical exclusion of lepers. It argues that with the gradual disappearance of leprosy, madness came to occupy this excluded position. The ship of fools in the 15th century is a literary version of one such exclusionary practice, the practice of sending mad people away in boats. However, during the Renaissance, madness was regarded as a common phenomenon because humans couldn't attain Divine Reason. As Cervantes' Don Quixote, all humans are weak to desires & dissimulation. Therefore, the insane, understood as those who had come too close to God's Reason, were accepted in the middle of society. It isn't before the 17th century, in a movement famously called the Great Confinement, that unreasonable people systematically were institutionalized. In the 18th century, the mad came to be seen as having lost what made them human & become animalistic & treated as such. It isn't before 19th century that madness was regarded as an illness to be cured.
Foucault wasn't talking about medical institutions designed specifically for the insane but about the creation of houses of confinement for social outsiders, including not only the insane but also vagrants, the poor & orphans, & what effect those houses of confinement had on the insane & perceptions of madness in the West. He demonstrates that while confinement of social outcastes was a generally European phenomenon, it had a unique development in France & distinct developments in other countries such as Germany & England.
Foucault also argues that madness during the Renaissance had the power to signify the limits of social order & to point to a deeper truth. This was silenced by Enlightened Reason. He also examines the rise of modern scientific & humanitarian treatment of the insane, notably at the hands of Philippe Pinel & Samuel Tuke. He claims these modern treatments were no less controlling than previous methods. Tuke's country retreat for the mad consisted of punishing them until they gave up their commitment to madness. Similarly, Pinel's treatment of the mad amounted to an extended aversion therapy, including such treatments as cold showers & straitjackets. This treatment amounted to repeated brutality until the pattern of judgment & punishment was internalized by the patient.