mythos

#Mythos finds a #curl vulnerability

yes, as in singular one.

https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2026/05/11/mythos-finds-a-curl-vulnerability/

#Mythos
听炸叔讲到了厄洛斯和普赛克的故事，感觉这不是灰姑娘加上美女与野兽吗？然后又想到了那篇EC文9-11-10…9-11-10真的是读完就再也忘不掉了…

#Mythos 能连起一串bug攻击软件系统，同样也能连起一串bug攻击社会系统。这一想更恐怖了。

More breathless, but vague praise for #Mythos. Now #mozilla's CTO has come out with a detail-free, hyperbole-laden blog post.

I can't get anything below the surface level on this blog post. Maybe I'm looking in the wrong places.

• The blog post itself contains no links or references (except a link to a prior blog post)
• The Firefox 150 release notes has zero mentions of #Claude, #Anthropic, or Mythos.
• The security advisories in Firefox 150 lists 41 bugs
  • Anthropic is credited exactly 3 times.
  • The blog post says This week’s release of Firefox 150 includes fixes for 271 vulnerabilities identified during this initial evaluation
  • it is not clear why the blog says 271, the release lists 41 issues, and only 3 acknowledge Anthropic
• I've tried looking on Mozilla's bugzilla and I have no access to any bug that is named in those release notes. I can't even see the conversation, much less the code change.

How is someone supposed to put this blog post's claims into context?