本书为法国著名思想家福柯在法兰西学院演讲系列之一，授课时间为1972-1973年。 授课中，福柯提到自从监狱被发明以来，刑事问题被看做是唯一的对犯罪行径的解决方式。福柯在本课程中，首次着手研究监狱形式的司法和社会特征，从长期以来不作为刑罚而是作为惩罚的监禁如何在社会中迅速转为刑罚这一问题开始深入，指出在过去监狱并没有被包含在刑法理论中，它在别处产生，为了其他的原因而形成，在某种意义上，对监狱的接受过程是从外部过渡到刑法理论的，而事后刑法理论有责任使监狱成为正当合法的。本课程与三个方面相悖——霍布斯/阿尔都塞，克劳塞维茨/戈夫曼，马克思/汤普森——其全部论据是围绕着五个基本的主题展开的：一是从镇压向生产方面的转折；二是政治经济学和非法活动理论的发展；三是马克思主义和意识形态分析的区别；四是道德谱系学；五是与之相伴的“规训—惩罚”。

那就让我们假定我们是睡着了。 ——勒内·笛卡尔，《第一哲学沉思集》 西格蒙德·弗洛伊德曾语：“如果梦境是晦涩的，那是为了不让我的意识所反对的潜在想法遭到泄露，是迫不得已。”诗人亨利·米肖又认为，做梦的我们身上有着“午夜人”般奇特的经历，他是我们自身的“反面”。人类总是被 定义为理性动物或政治动物，那么，我们能否将人类定义为“做梦的动物”？ 梦的解析是精神分析的重要课题，本书将对弗洛伊德所称“梦的工作”展开分析，这一心理过程也引发诸多哲学家的兴趣，从斯多葛学派到大卫·休谟，从笛卡尔到狄德罗，乃至斯宾诺莎和尼采，无数哲学家都曾诠释过梦，甚至弗吉尼亚·伍尔芙在其众多作品中所描绘的遐想的流动，也被人们认为是“白日做梦”的典型案例。 梦的外延在文学与电影创作中被不断扩展，甚至在政治生活中被赋予了意义。一九六三年，马丁·路德·金发表著名演讲《我有一个梦想》；《一九八四》中，温斯顿经历了极权主义的摧残，从此不再做梦了；而纳粹高层领导人罗伯特·莱伊曾写道：“在德国，唯一有着私人生活的人，是那些睡着了的人。”最终，人们说“人生如梦”。 做梦会给人类带来希望和慰藉吗？一个梦境不复存在的世界会使人类变得更加幸福，还是将成为一个泯灭人性的世界？ “不要再睡了！麦克白已经杀害了睡眠！”，威廉·莎士比亚让罪行骇人的麦克白夫人夜夜梦游，在噩梦中聊度余生。梦的奥义，或许就隐藏在这出人类的悲剧之中。 《梦》是读库“哲学系”译丛中的一种。“哲学系”译丛是一套由读库引自法国的哲学通识读物，每册围绕特定主题展开，旨在打破学术艰涩壁垒，引入哲学思考方法，触及现代文化的方方面面。每册小书都尝试以举证、思想取径与解读的方式，既探讨人类社会面临的大问题，也解决周遭生活的小烦恼；既享受思想之乐，也体验文字之美，使追求新知与热爱智慧成为可能。

啊！美德如此崇高，连窃贼们在自己洞穴的深处也敬重着她。 ——德尼·狄德罗，《百科全书》，“自然权利”词条 《荷马史诗》中，宙斯之子赫耳墨斯在出生的那一天就偷走了阿波罗的神牛。赫耳墨斯说：“我将驾驭一门最精湛的艺术……我将成为盗窃之王。”从荷马诗篇中走出的神祇创造了窃贼的第一副面孔。 窃贼为何盗窃，他偷走了什么？又在反抗什么？为何我们一边赞赏与众不同的大盗，一边唾弃偷东西的小贼？躲藏在树林间伺机而动的罗宾汉，将财物分给街头乞丐的卡尔图斯，以及在偷盗中寻找自由的“圣人”让·热内——“圣人对抗世界，亦抛弃世界，违背这个世界的规则，因而圣人应该是窃贼的榜样”，还有普里莫·莱维笔下在奥斯维辛集中营里互相盗窃的关押犯，本书首先分析了人类历史上的窃贼形象：小偷、侠匪、盗匠与莽贼，这些人是不道德者还是艺术家，是英雄还是庶民？对“窃贼”对比鲜明的形象描述使我们最终逐渐逃避了“盗窃”本身这一问题，换言之，我们几乎不会提问：什么是盗窃？ 本书随后将从塞利纳的《茫茫黑夜漫游》谈起，探寻盗窃行为究竟是针对剥削者的夺回、还是社会隐形的重新分配，亦或是一种纯粹的背叛和越轨。沿着圣奥古斯丁、卢梭、福柯、蒲鲁东与马克思的思想轨迹，问题最终将引向人类与财产权的关系。 当我们谈论共产主义、自由主义或是无政府主义，甚至认为“穷人对富人的存在有罪”、“所有权就是盗窃”时，其实不过是在谈论人类的财产关系——《悲惨世界》中，冉阿让为了不让亲人饿死，从面包店偷了一条面包，随后被判处五年苦役，他的人生就这样被彻底改变了。冉阿让的命运应当让我们对这个问题进行严肃的思考。 《盗窃》是读库“哲学系”译丛中的一种。“哲学系”译丛是一套由读库引自法国的哲学通识读物，每册围绕特定主题展开，旨在打破学术艰涩壁垒，引入哲学思考方法，触及现代文化的方方面面。每册小书都尝试以举证、思想取径与解读的方式，既探讨人类社会面临的大问题，也解决周遭生活的小烦恼；既享受思想之乐，也体验文字之美，使追求新知与热爱智慧成为可能。

如果我们相信艾希曼是个恶魔，那么就可以高枕无忧了。 ——汉娜·阿伦特，《艾希曼在耶路撒冷：一份关于平庸的恶的报告》 不服从，摧枯拉朽的历史浪潮帮助人类理解写在命运中的这三个字。安提戈涅违抗国王的命令，为暴尸于城外的波吕涅克斯举行葬礼；被长老会判处通奸罪的海丝特·白兰，怀中抱着婴儿站在绞刑台上示众；而奋力起义的奴隶斯巴达克斯在战斗中牺牲，他的六千余名同伴遭到俘虏，被钉在了从卡普亚到罗马沿途的十字架上。 违法、懈怠、造反，乃至多种多样的无政府主义运动，这些不服从的具体形式浸透着悲壮的英雄主义，构成人类政治文化的底色。它们或许无关宏旨，体现为个人的良心拒绝；或许发端于若干人等，凝结为公民不服从。亨利·戴维·梭罗首次提出“公民不服从”的概念，约翰·罗尔斯随后在《正义论》中将其定义为“非暴力反抗”；一九五五年，美国黑人女性罗莎·帕克斯在公交车上拒绝给白人让座——公民不服从终于成为一种重构公民身份所需的“基本违抗”，赋予人们不服从恶法的权利。 然而，现代教育首先教会孩子的却是服从，遵照规则和法律，在服从的过程中实现社会化。何以将其与自由相调和，在约束中培养自由？而随波逐流与盲目服从又是难以杜绝的社会现象。“米尔格兰姆实验”曾测试人们对威权的服从性：似乎所有人都十分明确地拒绝服从恶意的权威，为什么在具体实践中反抗恶令却如此艰难？ 围绕着服从与不服从，本书在探讨这两种高度关切人类意志的行为之外，为读者阐析了与其紧密勾连的自由、奴役、违抗与越轨等种种概念，以及它们携带的含义对民主社会造成的影响。浮现于诸多讨论背后的，最终是一些反抗者的形象。他们的声音在历史中交叠呼应，加缪替他们说出了那句频遭误解又历久弥新的话：“我反抗，故我们存在。” 《不服从》是读库“哲学系”译丛中的一种。“哲学系”译丛是一套由读库引自法国的哲学通识读物，每册围绕特定主题展开，旨在打破学术艰涩壁垒，引入哲学思考方法，触及现代文化的方方面面。每册小书都尝试以举证、思想取径与解读的方式，既探讨人类社会面临的大问题，也解决周遭生活的小烦恼；既享受思想之乐，也体验文字之美，使追求新知与热爱智慧成为可能。

The story of an impossible love between a woman named Fred and a transgender woman named Laurence who reveals her inner desire to become her true self.

Paul is preparing to leave Tajikistan, while thinking back on his adolescent years. His childhood, his mother's madness, the parties, the trip to the USSR where he lost his virginity, the friend who betrayed him and the love of his life.

本书为伽利玛出版社推出的“缔造法国的三十天”系列丛书中的一种（现已更名为“缔造法国的重要之日”），由享有国际声誉的法国史学家乔治·杜比撰写，记录法国历史上有重要意义的一天——1214年7月27日，周日。是日，法兰西国王菲利普·奥古斯都与神圣罗马帝国皇帝奥托、佛兰德斯伯爵 斐迪南和布洛涅伯爵雷诺率领的强大联军在布汶平原交战。法兰西国王得到上帝的庇佑，成为战场上最终的胜者。皇帝奥托落荒而逃，两位反叛的伯爵被俘。这是一场具有奠基意义的胜利，它大大巩固了法兰西君主制的根基。虽只是一场战斗、一起事件，但一战之微，亦有远旨。 勒高夫认为，《布汶的周日》是杜比的代表作。这部著作完美地将“结构”与“事件”结合在一起，向我们说明，对一个事件的分析离不开对长时段结构的理解。造就布汶的是之前长时间内的军事技术的进步、骑士比武和战争引发的经济行为的改变、权力的变化、心态与想象的变化。而布汶在历史中的意义也需要依靠记忆获得，依靠“布汶之后的布汶”去把握。 本书荣获1973年“大使奖”（Prix des Ambassadeurs）。

作者在浓厚的法国历史文化氛围中，用大量的历史细节和场景，丰富了对艺术、文化，对历史、社会，以及对“革命”的理解。

“我们来到这个世界时，命运是否早已被宣判？” . 当代著名思想家、《米歇尔·福柯传》作者 迪迪埃·埃里蓬切身之作 出版后即在《世界报》《自由报》等知名报刊引发热议 . 一部引发强烈共鸣的自我剖析之作 一部探讨底层民众成长困境的社会批判之作 . 著名知识分子如何与原生阶层 和解？ 不再将问题归咎于家人与心理创伤 而在教育制度、阶级差异中反思社会对人的塑造 . 这是“一场自己改变自己的劳作” 却在为更多贫困者寻找反抗的可能 🐜 编辑推荐 ◎享誉国际的当代著名思想家，反思自身出身背景和成长轨迹 作者为法国当代著名哲学家、思想家、社会学家迪迪埃·埃里蓬，已出版十几种著作，多部作品被认可为经典，也包括此书。这本书介于坦白和反思之间，既是一部个性化的学术著作，也是作者结合自己的出身背景和成长经历讲述的故事，在研究者眼中是学术讨论，在普通读者眼中，是深入浅出、令人共鸣的回忆录。目前该书已由德国著名导演托马斯·奥斯玛雅（Thomas Ostermeier）改编为同名戏剧。 ◎关注阶级固化问题和边缘群体，以实际案例为依据为努力生活而奋力抗争的人发声 父亲死后，作者回到阔别三十年的家乡兰斯（Reims），并重新反思了自身过往经历、家乡及其周边地区的境况。从家人、家乡工人阶级民众的生活，女性长辈被剥夺的权利，到兰斯这一区域的被边缘化，相对主流文化而存在的“亚文化”……迪迪埃·埃里蓬关注的是阶级壁垒中下平民阶层的生活，是“被侮辱和损害的人”，是使他们获得“启蒙”的可能。 ◎反思学校教育在社会对人的塑造中扮演的角色，致力于审视教育系统施加的社会指令 从父辈的教育经历到自己的教育经历，埃里蓬致力于冷静反观学校教育与社会秩序的“合谋”。从大批辍学的孩子，到无法融入校园文化而反叛、加入“亚文化”群体的孩子，埃里蓬说：“教师们已经尽其所能！……他们能改变的东西太少了。”学校是社会的战场之一，阶级的壁垒也存在于校园文化之中，埃里蓬致力于打破隔阂，探寻新的可能。 ◎从“小家庭”到“大世界”，剖析了权力与抵抗的多种形式 从因无法完成学业而懊怒一生的母亲，有暴力倾向、总是大喊大叫的父亲，到把孩子们丢给孤儿院的外祖母，作者重新理解了家人的处境和家长在家庭教育中缺失的原因。由此，他也看到了家乡误入犯罪歧途的青少年、在阶层固化中放弃学业的工人们……社会如何塑造着底层民众，底层民众又是如何屈从的？作者试图剖析塑造和屈从的机制，重新理解他曾厌恶和逃离的人。 ◎结合现实，深入浅出地消化著名哲学家、社会学家的理论和思想 喜欢让-保罗·萨特、皮埃尔·布尔迪厄、米歇尔·福柯的读者将会深感亲切，因为作者会满怀激情地讲述自己是如何被他们鼓舞的，他们的理论也将与作者所经历的社会现实融合在一起，产生新的生发点。 . 🐜 内容简介 《回归故里》是法国哲学家、社会学家迪迪埃·埃里蓬结合自身经历创作的一部反思性社会学著作。父亲去世后，作者迪迪埃·埃里蓬决定回到自己的出生地兰斯，重新了解他最初诞生的社会阶层和那群他已经告别三十年的人。他重返过去，回顾家族的历史，回忆童年时身处的工人阶级阶层，回溯了他如何从工人家庭的穷孩子成为法国著名的知识分子…… 在这场极为内在又颠覆的心灵之旅中，作者思考了社会阶层、学校教育、身份建立等一系列主题，通过梳理集体决定论中不同个体的命运轨迹，剖析了不同社会环境下，人的“个人选择”是如何被影响、被决定的。 . 🐜 名人和媒体推荐 《回归故里》是一部引人入胜、充满勇气的作品，讲述一位法国著名作家如何使复杂的、时常冲突的社会身份与精神身份交汇在一起。 ——利奥·贝尔萨尼（Leo Bersani） 这是一本扣人心弦的书，关于压抑，关于抛弃自己的出身，关于重获平衡。 ——《美国艺术》 埃里蓬总是会回到他所说的发现心灵生命的“奇迹”中。“毕竟，”他指出，“人们应该学习，阅读令人愉快，书是你能够热爱的东西——这些态度并不是普遍的，实际上与社会条件以及你的出身背景密切相关。”我们这些足够幸运，从小时候开始就能拥有这些的人只能向他致敬。 ——《卫报》 “我曾经以为，”迪迪埃·埃里蓬说，“人们可以远离家庭独自生活，可以忘却个人历史以及那些生养自己的人，重新创造自己”——在回顾了那段逝去的历史，并心怀敬畏地对那些他曾经背离的人们致以敬意之后，作者用这段颇具美感的文字陈述着这样一个事实：背离家庭与过去是永远无法彻底实现的。或许真正的“回归故里”并不存在，但至少让我们努力“与自己，以及那个被我们抛下的世界和解”。 ——《世界报》

Berlin in June of 1940. While Nazi propaganda celebrates the regime’s victory over France, a kitchen-cum-living room in Prenzlauer Berg is filled with grief. Anna and Otto Quangel’s son has been killed at the front. This working class couple had long believed in the ‘Führer’ and followed him willingly, but now they realise that his promises are nothing but lies and deceit. They begin writing postcards as a form of resistance and in a bid to raise awareness: Stop the war machine! Kill Hitler! Putting their lives at risk, they distribute these cards in the entrances of tenement buildings and in stairwells. But the SS and the Gestapo are soon onto them, and even their neighbours pose a threat.

1961 film by Guy Debord

Voice 1 (male "professional announcer" type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts. These people also scorned "subjective profundity". They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves. Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished. Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives. Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production. The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation. Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety. The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole "” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning. This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them. The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued... Voice 2: "Our life is a journey "” In the winter and the night. "” We seek our passage..."� Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations. Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality. On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time. Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom. Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive. Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language. Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment "ordinary life"� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever. The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns. What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality. Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations. Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep. Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world. Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past. Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end. Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it. Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept? Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything. Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time. Voice 1: Really hard to drink more. Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation "” poor and false like this botched traveling shot. Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed. Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need. The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life. To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point? Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories. 1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

🚪如果一切重来，我们能否拥有理想人生？ 🚪让整个法国重获生活勇气的人性疗愈小说 🚪关于遗忘与失去、牺牲与选择，献给认真生活的每个人 🚪一经面世，便迅速摘得法国各大读书畅销榜桂冠 🚪1周内版权售出全球20余个国家及地区 🚪荣获让·德梅森法文小说大奖，法国亚马逊5星推荐 🚪《莎拉的钥匙》导演吉勒·巴盖特-布赫内重金抢下影视改编权 🚪“中国zui美的书”获奖设计师操刀设计，随书附赠精美书签 🚪内文采用芬兰进口轻型纸，柔顺易翻，轻盈便携，环保护眼 ------------------------------------------------------- 【内容简介】 热雷米二十岁生日这天，他鼓足勇气向青梅竹马的维多利亚告白，不料被一口拒绝。他心如死灰，决定告别这个世界。 然而，当热雷米睁开眼睛，已是他二十一岁生日，一年时间悄然流逝。所幸维多利亚守在身边，并深深地爱上了他。夜幕降临，他又昏昏睡去。再度清醒时，是他二十三岁生日，维多利亚是他的妻子，并与他有了一个可爱的孩子。生活仿佛如他所愿。 直到某次醒来，维多利亚伤心欲绝地离去，并指控他是残忍、可怕的恶魔。热雷米发现，这一切并没有那么简单…… ------------------------------------------------------- 【媒体推荐】 提埃里•科恩以一种流畅而又尖锐的笔触描绘了人类经验的脆弱性，以及在面对生命时，我们必须做出的痛苦选择。故事扣人心弦，引人入胜。 ——塔季雅娜·德·罗斯奈，《莎拉的钥匙》作者 一本绝对值得一读再读的好书。一旦打开这本书，什么都无法阻止你读完它。这是一本探讨人存在的意义、人与周围的人的关系（特别是爱情与亲情）的书。既呈现生命的礼赞，也流露出深思后的乐观豁达。 ——Jimmydors，书评人 既为书中情感的强度所震撼，又为故事中人物艰难而痛苦的处境感到不安，如身临其境，深深被折服。 ——法国亚马逊读者 一部精彩绝伦的小说！令人从第一页呼吸急促地读到最后一页，久久无法平静。 ——《读书》杂志 一个精心策划的离奇故事。 ——《ARTRAVEL》杂志 一本关于生死的杰作。 ——《VIVA》杂志

Deneuve plays sassy grandmother Bettie who takes to the road after being betrayed by her lover and learning her business is on the verge of bankruptcy on the same day. During a weeklong odyssey across France, she spends time with a grandson she hardly knows and reconnects with her past as former Miss Brittany through a reunion for former beauty queens.

2013 film directed by Katell Quillévéré

It is an autobiographical fiction starring Ivens as an old man who has spent his life trying to "tame the wind and harness the sea" by capturing them on film.

“如果你驯养了我，我们就会彼此需要。你对我来说是独特的，我对你来说也是独特的。” “只有通过心灵，才能看得清楚；本质的东西用眼睛是看不见的。” 《小王子》是被亿万读者誉为不可不读的不朽经典，展示出人类共同的精神世界，写尽灵魂的纯真与孤独，提醒我们，只有爱，才是我们活下去的理由。 遥远星球上的小王子，与美丽而骄傲的玫瑰吵架后出走，在各星球漫游，遇到傲慢的国王、酒鬼、惟利是图的商人、死守教条的地理学家，最后来到地球，试图找到治愈孤独和痛苦的良方。 他遇到一只奇怪的狐狸，于是奇妙而令人惊叹的事情发生了…… —————————— ★世界知名出版社白星集团重磅打造、独家授权，引发《小王子》迷收藏热潮的唯美典藏绘本，红遍英、美等40多国和地区，百万读者一致推荐的口碑之作！美国最大的读书社区网站Goodreads 4.3分高分推荐！ ★荣获凯特·格林威大奖提名、获非洲童书奖年度荣誉图书与银行街年度最佳童书等多项大奖，欧洲炙手可热的画家曼纽拉·阿德雷亚尼精心绘制，细腻敏感的画风生动再现了小王子探索宇宙的想象之旅，展示了这一超越时空的经典故事的全部魔力，唤醒了它饱满的诗意。 ★考究的整体布局、细腻的氛围营造，让每一张插图都堪称艺术品，让读者宛如置身于美术馆，在享受美好的文字、动人的故事同时，带来一场全新、前所未有的视觉震撼。 ★大开本唯美绘本，可以触摸每一处细节之美！亲子共读的绝佳读物！ ★人类有史以来必读经典第1名。创下317种语言出版的惊人纪录，总销量突破2亿册，仅次于《圣经》。使人永葆童心的不朽经典，得到全球亿万读者盛赞！ —————————— 媒体评价： 这部20世纪著名的文学作品，在曼纽拉·阿德雷亚尼插画版中变得更为丰富、饱满。 ──美国《国家地理》杂志 白星出版社重新呈现了这部20世纪的文学经典。故事中的小王子在宇宙的旅途中学到生命与爱的真谛。曼纽拉·阿德雷亚尼以其独有的敏感笔触，用华美的插画独制了一本全新的值得珍藏的《小王子》。《小王子》自最初发行以来便受到全世界老少的喜爱。尽管它以童话的形式出现，但故事中蕴含的想象、智慧和情感能让所有读者都从中受益、获得快乐。世代的读者永远能在此书中找到新的精神财富。 ──澳大利亚《阅读》杂志 最伟大的存在主义小说。 ──德国哲学家海德格尔 经典中的经典。 ──《纽约客》 人类有史以来最佳读物。 ──法国《读书》杂志 不仅是有史以来最受欢迎的童话故事之一，更是一则歌颂纯真智慧的寓言。 ──美国《纽约时报》 《小王子》以间接的方式使孩子们懂得一种道理。它直击他们心灵深处，当他们领悟这种道理时，它就像一束小小的光亮点亮他们的心灵。 ──美国《纽约先驱论坛报》 很少有书能与《小王子》那宇宙性般无所不包的魅力相匹敌。 ──英国《卫报》 每个人都应该至少读三次《小王子》。第一次在童年时读，第二次在成年后读，最后一次读是要在成年后仍提醒自己不要忘记生命中最重要的是什么。 ──加拿大《每日星报》 世界上的童话多得你一辈子都读不过来，可是写得像《小王子》那么透明、单纯、干净，读完之后让你有一种忘记尘世，仿佛降落到了另外一个星球上似的童话，还只有这么一部。 ──中国著名儿童文学作家彭懿 我想，应该把《小王子》译成各种文字，发行几十亿册，让世界上每个孩子和每个尚可挽救的大人都读一读，这样世界一定会变得可爱一些，会比较适合不同年龄的小王子们居住。 ──中国著名学者、作家周国平